Tim Schulte Publikationen
(Alle Abstracts einblenden)
(Alle Abstracts ausblenden)
2020
-
Patrick Caspari, Robert Mattmüller und Tim Schulte.
A Framework to Prove Strong Privacy in Multi-Agent Planning.
In
Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Distributed and Multi-Agent Planning
(DMAP 2020), S. 32-39.
2020.
(PDF)
2019
-
Tim Schulte und Bernhard Nebel.
Trial-based Heuristic Tree-search for Distributed Multi-Agent Planning.
In
Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search (SoCS 2019)
(SoCS 2019).
2019.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
We present a novel search scheme for privacy-preserving multi-agent
planning, inspired by UCT search. We compare the presented approach to
classical multi-agent forward search and evaluate it based on benchmarks
from the CoDMAP competition.
2018
-
Tim Schulte.
Stubborn Sets Pruning for Privacy Preserving Planning.
In
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search (SoCS 2018)
(SoCS 2018).
2018.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
We adapt a partial-order reduction technique based on stubborn sets to the
setting of privacy-preserving multi-agent planning. We prove that the
presented approach preserves optimality and show experimentally that it can
significantly improve search performance on some domains.
-
Tim Schulte.
Stubborn Sets Pruning for Privacy Preserving Planning.
In
Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Distributed and Multi-Agent Planning (DMAP 2018)
(DMAP 2018).
2018.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
We adapt a partial-order reduction technique based on stubborn sets to the
setting of privacy-preserving multi-agent planning. We prove that the
presented approach preserves optimality and show experimentally that it can
significantly improve search performance on some domains.
2016
-
Tim Schulte und Bernhard Nebel.
Trial-based Heuristic Tree-search for Distributed Multi-Agent Planning.
In
Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search (SoCS 2016)
(SoCS 2016).
2016.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
We present a novel search scheme for privacy-preserving multi-agent
planning, inspired by UCT search. We compare the presented approach to
classical multi-agent forward search and evaluate it based on benchmarks
from the CoDMAP competition.
-
Tim Schulte und Bernhard Nebel.
Trial-based Heuristic Tree-search for Distributed Multi-Agent Planning.
In
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Distributed and Multi-Agent Planning (DMAP 2016)
(DMAP 2016).
2016.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
We present a novel search scheme for privacy-preserving multi-agent
planning. Inspired by UCT search, the scheme is based on growing an
asynchronous search tree by running repeated trials through the tree. We
describe key differences to classical multi-agent forward search, discuss
theoretical properties of the presented approach, and evaluate it based on
benchmarks from the CoDMAP competition.
2014
-
Tim Schulte und Thomas Keller.
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Classical Planning.
In
Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search (SoCS 2014)
(SoCS 2014).
2014.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
(BIB)
Successful heuristic search planners for satisficing planning like FF or LAMA
are usually based on one or more best first search techniques. Recent research
has led to planners like Arvand, Roamer or Probe, where novel techniques like
Monte-Carlo Random Walks extend the traditional exploitation-focused best first
search by an exploration component. The UCT algorithm balances these
contradictory incentives and has shown tremendous success in related areas of
sequential decision making but has never been applied to classical planning
yet. We make up for this shortcoming by applying the Trial-based Heuristic Tree
Search framework to classical planning. We show how to model the best first
search techniques Weighted A* and Greedy Best First Search with only three
ingredients: action selection, initialization and backup function. Then we use
THTS to derive four versions of the UCT algorithm that differ in the used
backup functions. The experimental evaluation shows that our main algorithm,
GreedyUCT*, outperforms all other algorithms presented in this paper,
both in terms of coverage and quality.