Benedict Wright – Publikationen
(Alle Abstracts einblenden)
(Alle Abstracts ausblenden)
2019
2018
-
Benedict Wright, Robert Mattmüller und Bernhard Nebel.
Compiling Away Soft Trajectory Constraints in Planning.
In
Proceedings of the Sixteenth COnference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR18), S. 474-482.
2018.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
Soft goals in planning are optional objectives that should be achieved in the terminal state. However, failing to achieve them does not result in the plan becoming invalid. State trajectory constraints are hard requirements towards the state trajectory of the plan. Soft trajectory constraints are a combination of both: soft preferences on how the hard goals are reached, i. e., optional requirements towards the state trajectory of the plan. Such a soft trajectory constraint may require that some fact should be always true, or should be true at some point during the plan. The quality of a plan is then measured by a metric which adds the sum of all action costs and a penalty for each failed soft trajectory constraint. Keyder and Geffner showed that soft goals can be compiled away. We generalize this approach and illustrate a method of compiling soft trajectory constraints into conditional effects and state-dependent action costs using LTL f and deterministic finite automata. We provide two compilation schemes, with and without reward shaping, by rewarding and penalizing different states in the plan. With this we are able to handle such soft trajectory constraints without the need of altering the search algorithm or heuristics, using classical planners.
-
Benedict Wright, Robert Mattmüller und Bernhard Nebel.
Compiling Away Soft Trajectory Constraints in Planning.
In
Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge Engineering for Planning and Scheduling (KEPS18), S. 38-45.
2018.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
Soft goals in planning are optional objectives that should be achieved in the terminal state. However, failing to achieve them does not result in the plan becoming invalid. State trajectory constraints are hard requirements towards the state trajectory of the plan. Soft trajectory constraints are a combination of both: soft preferences on how the hard goals are reached, i. e., optional requirements towards the state trajectory of the plan. Such a soft trajectory constraint may require that some fact should be always true, or should be true at some point during the plan. The quality of a plan is then measured by a metric which adds the sum of all action costs and a penalty for each failed soft trajectory constraint. Keyder and Geffner showed that soft goals can be compiled away. We generalize this approach and illustrate a method of compiling soft trajectory constraints into conditional effects and state-dependent action costs using LTL f and deterministic finite automata. We provide two compilation schemes, with and without reward shaping, by rewarding and penalizing different states in the plan. With this we are able to handle such soft trajectory constraints without the need of altering the search algorithm or heuristics, using classical planners.
-
Benedict Wright, Oliver Brunner und Bernhard Nebel.
On the Importance of a Research Data Archive.
In
Proceedings of the eighth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI 2018).
2018.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
As research becomes more and more data intensive, managing this data becomes a major challenge in any organization. At university level there is seldom a unified data management system in place. The general approach to storing data in such environments is to deploy network storage. Each member can store their data organized to their own likings in their dedicated location on the network. Additionally, users tend to store data in distributed manner such as on private devices, portable storage, or public and private repositories. Adding to this complexity, it is common for university departments to have high fluctuation of staff, resulting in major loss of information and data on an employee's departure. A common scenario then is that it is known that certain data has already been created via experiments or simulation. However, it can not be retrieved, resulting in a repetition of generation, which is costly and time-consuming. Additionally, as of recent years, publishers and funding agencies insist on storing, sharing, and reusing existing research data. We show how digital preservation can help group leaders and their employees cope with these issues, by introducing our own archival system OntoRAIS.
-
Robert Mattmüller, Florian Geißer, Benedict Wright und Bernhard Nebel.
On the Relationship Between State-Dependent Action Costs and Conditional Effects in Planning.
In
Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2018).
2018.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
When planning for tasks that feature both state-dependent action costs and conditional effects using relaxation heuristics, the following problem appears: handling costs and effects separately leads to worse-than-necessary heuristic values, since we may get the more useful effect at the lower cost by choosing different values of a relaxed variable when determining relaxed costs and relaxed active effects.
In this paper, we show how this issue can be avoided by representing state-dependent costs and conditional effects uniformly, both as edge-valued multi-valued decision diagrams (EVMDDs) over different sets of edge values, and then working with their product diagram. We develop a theory of EVMDDs that is general enough to encompass state-dependent action costs, conditional effects, and even their combination.
We define relaxed effect semantics in the presence of state-dependent action costs and conditional effects, and describe how this semantics can be efficiently computed using product EVMDDs. This will form the foundation for informative relaxation heuristics in the setting with state-dependent costs and conditional effects combined.
2017
-
Robert Mattmüller, Florian Geißer, Benedict Wright und Bernhard Nebel.
On the Relationship Between State-Dependent Action Costs and Conditional Effects in Planning.
In
Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Heuristics and Search for Domain-Independent Planning (HSDIP 2017).
2017.
Superseded by the AAAI 2018 paper by the same name.
(Abstract einblenden)
(Abstract ausblenden)
(PDF)
When planning for tasks that feature both state-dependent action costs and conditional effects using relaxation heuristics, the following problem appears: handling costs and effects separately leads to worse-than-necessary heuristic values, since we may get the more useful effect at the lower cost by choosing different values of a relaxed variable when determining relaxed costs and relaxed active effects.
In this paper, we show how this issue can be avoided by representing state-dependent costs and conditional effects uniformly, both as edge-valued multi-valued decision diagrams (EVMDDs) over different sets of edge values, and then working with their product diagram. We develop a theory of EVMDDs that is general enough to encompass state-dependent action costs, conditional effects, and even their combination.
We define relaxed effect semantics in the presence of state-dependent action costs and conditional effects, and describe how this semantics can be efficiently computed using product EVMDDs. This will form the foundation for informative relaxation heuristics in the setting with state-dependent costs and conditional effects combined.
2016
